While I haven’t spoken to him today, I expect that he feels like he played an important part in what happened last night. Most importantly I think there are many people of all persuasions and political affiliations around the country to feel ready to change the way we govern, and to make government work for the people again. The media may still portray a country divided, but if you watched the celebrations last night on television, or spoke with family members who traditionally vote Republican across the board who, in this election at least, voted for Obama, I think it’s clear that our country is more united today than it has been in years. While the far right will paint Obama as a raging liberal, his call for personal responsibility is one rarely heard from any other politician with the same degree of sincerity and conviction. Can we make a difference for our children? Can we put aside our differences and unite under the idea that we all want prosperity, freedom, and equality? In the words of our new Commander In Chief, Yes We Can.

Cheers,

David

Hi friends,

I haven’t preached for awhile on peak oil and our over population. I just got back recently from the ASPO peak oil conference in Sacramento so I thought I would share some thoughts. It was enlightening as always and this time somewhat overshadowed by the financial crisis. Lots to digest. We remain on the plateau of maximum oil production since 2005 of around 84 million barrels of oil a day and it is doubtful that new production will offset depletion of the old megafields to change this. 2012-2015 is the forecast for the crunch time when new production will be less than the depletion rate and will happen when world oil demand will only have grown so until then volatility will swing all over the map. Economic recession may create some demand destruction that could depress oil pricing on one side and the depletion and huge appetite keeping supplies tight. After this 2012-2015 period the forecast looks bleak as we descend down the back side of the bell curve of increasing depletion and decreased production. This was the message from the conference on the oil front. Alternatives cannot be scaled but rapid deployment of everything from wind, solar and nuclear would be wise but without major cuts in consumption won’t solve our problems. So how does this affect the big picture?

Jeff photographs some dwarf plants
on the North Slope, AK

Originally uploaded by woodcreeper.

I am somewhat sanguine about a cultural shift in the near term future. We are on the knife’s edge and the painful consequences of our overshoot as a species approaching 7 billion may lead us to a global consensus to radically change our values and directions away from consumption and materialism but it can equally lead us toward resource wars and fascism. This is a proverbial fork in the road of historic proportions. You cannot ignore the statistics of the huge flood of humanity in China India Brazil and many other places who are trying to reach their own version of the “American Dream” of consumption or the developed world’s tenacious determination to keep unsustainable lifestyles going. To bring about a shift toward recognizing sustainability as a foundation for our survival instead of some trendy buzz word will require a series of painful consequences. This puts me in this strange place where I find optimism in calamity as it seems the only force to question the status quo. At least calamity until peak oil and other limits to our growth become understood in our collective conscious.

We are an overpopulated species on the planet. A hundred years ago there were less than one billion of us. Today there are almost 7 billion. Our modern civilization has been masterful for over 100 years of harnessing the planet’s resources and experiencing what is for a species a remarkable exponential growth. Every decade that this exponential growth has skyrocketed upwards we have made ourselves more and more vulnerable to a chaotic collapse. The further a complex system moves away from equilibrium the less likely that its return to equilibrium can be done in an orderly way. I remember my lessons in evolution and ecology. That long periods of equilibrium are punctuated by rapid change and chaos. This seems to be characteristic of complex systems. What is more likely going forward? That we can return to equilibrium and a sustainable global population through an orderly mitigation that will be supported by the masses of humans who have become normalized to high consumption levels or that a collapse and chaos will bring about a rapid return to equilibrium and that the horrific experience of passing through this will have profound consequences and be culturally transformative for the human survivors?

I have a hard time seeing how we can achieve an orderly pathway toward a sustainable equilibrium when the ascent that brought us to where we are happened so rapidly. Since 2003 when I went to the first peak oil event I suspected this was a defining theme of the 21st century. Things have unfolded more quickly than I could have imagined to confirm this.

We should all be psychologically prepared that we are not passing through temporary instability but rather just the opening acts of what will prove an immensely challenging century. It will be a hell of a ride and not without positive challenges for our children. They will be the first generation to seriously confront this mess and really be forced to do something about it. There is the potential for great noble achievements. This death of consumption will be replaced with the birth of producing sustainable models of living. Themes going forward? Try frugality, humility, community, making stuff, fixing stuff, growing you own food. Being resourceful with less. Friendships.

This e-mail is mainly a reminder that the peak oil story is real, that our exponential growth and over population is reaching fundamental tipping points in our biosphere ranging from the collapse of marine fisheries, climate change, fresh water depletion, top soil depletion, extinctions and loss of biodiversity.

We have already past the doorsteps and have entered the opening scenes living in the reality of these tipping points. We have moved way beyond an ideological struggle and into the physical consequences of our overshoot.

No need to preach this stuff. Consequences are at our door step!

Jeff

P.S. I guess the last thing you really wanted to read was this sunny e-mail after watching the stock market in the US lose the most in one day since over 20 years. Is the credit crisis related to the limits of growth that peak oil and other resource depletions are indicating? The US economic system has grown so deeply in debt that we are spending our grandchildren’s wealth. Are we not also spending our grandchildren’s energy resources and shifting the consequences of environmental collapse on to them? Think of the deeper spiritual implications of breathing and drinking your grandchildren’s oxygen and water?

The Great Schlep from The Great Schlep on Vimeo.

Generation Chickenhawk: The Unauthorized College Republican Convention Tour from huffpost on Vimeo

September 13, 2008, 2:01 pm

This is Your Nation on White Privilege

By Tim Wise

For those who still can’t grasp the concept of white privilege, or who are constantly looking for some easy-to-understand examples of it, perhaps this list will help.

White privilege is when you can get pregnant at seventeen like Bristol Palin and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family is a personal matter, and that no one has a right to judge you or your parents, because “every family has challenges,” even as black and Latino families with similar “challenges” are regularly typified as irresponsible, pathological and arbiters of social decay.

White privilege is when you can call yourself a “fuckin’ redneck,” like Bristol Palin’s boyfriend does, and talk about how if anyone messes with you, you’ll “kick their fuckin’ ass,” and talk about how you like to “shoot shit” for fun, and still be viewed as a responsible, all-American boy (and a great son-in-law to be) rather than a thug.

White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of, then returned to after making up some coursework at a community college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to achievement, whereas a person of color who did this would be viewed as unfit for college, and probably someone who only got in in the first place because of affirmative action.

White privilege is when you can claim that being mayor of a town smaller than most medium-sized colleges, and then Governor of a state with about the same number of people as the lower fifth of the island of Manhattan, makes you ready to potentially be president, and people don’t all piss on themselves with laughter, while being a black U.S. Senator, two-term state Senator, and constitutional law scholar, means you’re “untested.”


White privilege is being able to say that you support the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance because “if it was good enough for the founding fathers, it’s good enough for me,” and not be immediately disqualified from holding office–since, after all, the pledge was written in the late 1800s and the “under God” part wasn’t added until the 1950s–while believing that reading accused criminals and terrorists their rights (because, ya know, the Constitution, which you used to teach at a prestigious law school requires it), is a dangerous and silly idea only supported by mushy liberals.


White privilege is being able to be a gun enthusiast and not make people immediately scared of you.


White privilege is being able to have a husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your state to secede from the Union, and whose motto was “Alaska first,” and no one questions your patriotism or that of your family, while if you’re black and your spouse merely fails to come to a 9/11 memorial so she can be home with her kids on the first day of school, people immediately think she’s being disrespectful.


White privilege is being able to make fun of community organizers and the work they do–like, among other things, fight for the right of women to vote, or for civil rights, or the 8-hour workday, or an end to child labor–and people think you’re being pithy and tough, but if you merely question the experience of a small town mayor and 18-month governor with no foreign policy expertise beyond a class she took in college–you’re somehow being mean, or even sexist.


White privilege is being able to convince white women who don’t even agree with you on any substantive issue to vote for you and your running mate anyway, because all of a sudden your presence on the ticket has inspired confidence in these same white women, and made them give your party a “second look.”


White privilege is being able to fire people who didn’t support your political campaigns and not be accused of abusing your power or being a typical politician who engages in favoritism, while being black and merely knowing some folks from the old-line political machines in Chicago means you must be corrupt.


White privilege is being able to attend churches over the years whose pastors say that people who voted for John Kerry or merely criticize George W. Bush are going to hell, and that the U.S. is an explicitly Christian nation and the job of Christians is to bring Christian theological principles into government, and who bring in speakers who say the conflict in the Middle East is God’s punishment on Jews for rejecting Jesus, and everyone can still think you’re just a good church-going Christian, but if you’re black and friends with a black pastor who has noted (as have Colin Powell and the U.S. Department of Defense) that terrorist attacks are often the result of U.S. foreign policy and who talks about the history of racism and its effect on black people, you’re an extremist who probably hates America.


White privilege is not knowing what the Bush Doctrine is when asked by a reporter, and then people get angry at the reporter for asking you such a “trick question,” while being black and merely refusing to give one-word answers to the queries of Bill O’Reilly means you’re dodging the question, or trying to seem overly intellectual and nuanced.


White privilege is being able to claim your experience as a POW has anything at all to do with your fitness for president, while being black and experiencing racism is, as Sarah Palin has referred to it a “light” burden.


And finally, white privilege is the only thing that could possibly allow someone to become president when he has voted with George W. Bush 90 percent of the time, even as unemployment is skyrocketing, people are losing their homes, inflation is rising, and the U.S. is increasingly isolated from world opinion, just because white voters aren’t sure about that whole “change” thing. Ya know, it’s just too vague and ill-defined, unlike, say, four more years of the same, which is very concrete and certain…


White privilege is, in short, the problem.